Time’s Up: IEEE Timeline finds that Younger Generations are Playing Video Games for Shorter Periods of Time

  • ieeeInteractive timeline also reveals that the majority of gamers prefer to play alone more than online; AR/VR will be the future of video games


New Delhi, August 14, 2015 – One of the most common behaviors of gaming aficionados over the years has been to sit for hours at a time playing with, or against, fellow gamers across the world, but recent findings from IEEE, the world’s largest professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for humanity, has dispelled myths of the “traditional” gamer. IEEE today revealed data on the past and future of gaming, based on input from an interactive timeline. Gamers from around the world were invited to view and participate in the interactive timeline launched on Facebook from June 11 – July 13.


The timeline revealed that younger generations of gamers are actually playing for a shorter period of time. Respondents aged 18-24 years shared that they have only played five to eight hours, at most, in one sitting, while respondents aged 25-34 years indicated that the longest they have played videos games in one sitting was 15+ hours, more than twice the amount of hours spent by younger participants. The average amount of gaming in one sitting as reported by timeline participants was approximately eight hours.


Fifty-eight percent of participants also revealed that they prefer gaming in campaign over online mode. Solo game-playing in campaign mode, a continuous storyline in a fictitious world, has become the favorite choice for gamers compared to online gaming where the gamer is connected to opponents through the internet.


“Younger generations of gamers are spending less of their time gaming due to the ever-growing and ever-present social considerations around them,” said Stu Lipoff, IEEE Fellow and president of IP Action Partners. “Advancements in technology such as cell phones, tablets, wearables and social media channels, like Facebook and Twitter, are vying for the attention of young adults and children. This new generation’s means of social interaction has shifted from online game play, where they can interact via gaming with friends or strangers, to these other social communication methods. An argument for the increased interest in campaign mode can stem from players not needing social interaction online for a quality gaming experience.”


A trend also emerged from the findings that those in the gaming world are confident that augmented realty/virtual reality (AR/VR) will be the next revolution in gaming. When asked about the “next big innovation for gaming,” 51 percent of respondents, globally, believe that (AR/VR) is the future of gaming. Open-source gaming (21 percent), which allows the user to customize their game play and formatting because the game’s source codes are publically available, and second-screen gaming/smart glasses (18 percent) rounded out the top three “next big innovation for gaming” responses from participants.


According to Todd Richmond, IEEE Fellow and director of advanced prototypes at the University of Southern California Institute for Creative Technologies (ICT), this statistic seems to follow a trend that will only continue to grow. “Game developers are already starting to embrace AR/VR and blended reality. There is no doubt that these immersive technologies will be the most important innovation of the next gaming generation, and will also impact every other aspect of our lives. The gaming industry will be an early adopter and help figure out how the technology is viable. By 2017, AR/VR/blended reality technologies will be easily and affordably brought into consumer homes thanks largely to video games.”


Additional responses from participants regarding the most significant developments of the eight gaming generations include:

  • Forty-six percent feel that rom-cartridges were the most impactful technology developed during the second generation of gaming (1977-1983).
  • Helping with system speeds, the fourth generation of gaming (1987-1994) brought CD-ROM gaming consoles to the forefront, but 53 percent of participants actually feel that the most impactful technology during that generation was 16-bit microprocessors.
  • During the sixth generation of gaming (1997-2005), 31 percent of survey respondents believe that advancements in gaming consoles’ central processing unit/graphics processing unit (CPU/GPU) speeds were the most impactful technology of that generation.

Industry expert Elena Bertozzi, IEEE member and associate professor of game design and development at Quinnipiac University, believes that there is a shift in the way gaming is being perceived, increasing its popularity and acceptance. “Gaming is no longer considered to be something that is a waste of one’s time,” said Bertozzi. “Advancements throughout the eight generations of gaming have not only improved user experience and overall gaming quality, but have allowed gaming technology to be parlayed into other applications. These additional uses, like aerospace and military training, or motivating employees in the workplace, have changed the connotation of gaming and expanded the industry’s consumers.”


About IEEE

IEEE is a large, global professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. Through its highly cited publications, conferences, technology standards, and professional and educational activities, IEEE is the trusted voice on a wide variety of areas ranging from aerospace systems, computers and telecommunications to biomedical engineering, electric power and consumer electronics. Learn more at http://www.ieee.org.



About the Timeline

IEEE’s interactive gaming timeline was introduced to the organization’s Facebook page on June 11 and walked the user through the eight generations of gaming, asking participants their views on each generation’s top innovations and the future of the industry. The timeline was self-paced and allowed participants to read and respond to questions at their own leisure. There was a differential in the number of respondents ranging between 639 – 2314, depending upon the question. The survey closed to participants July 13.